Spain: Sightings in the Sierra Norte of Seville (2000)
New Sightings in the Sierra Norte of Seville
Encounters with mysterious objects at night
By José Manuel García Bautista
Due to its complexity and strangeness, the UFO phenomenon is far more than mere field research into specific encounters and sightings—where witnesses observe mysterious lights and shapes that shatter their established mental frameworks. The witness factor must be rigorously studied and analyzed, as the information obtained from it lays the groundwork for a more thorough and detailed investigation. For an investigation to be valid, witnesses must possess absolute credibility and an unparalleled level of truthfulness; otherwise, the inquiry would be flawed and lack believability. I emphasize the word "CREDIBILITY" because, without it, we risk encountering cases of fraud or people chasing fame, money, and—why not?—the status of being a researcher.
Many still argue that analyzing the witness factor is not particularly important, given its inherently subjective nature and susceptibility to various external and internal factors that can distort sensory perception. While this assertion is entirely true, it overlooks the fact that witnesses in a UFO case must still be "questioned" to rule out potential anomalies affecting their senses and altering their perception. No serious investigation can exist without a conscientious analysis of this aspect. After all, how could we possibly gauge the truthfulness and plausibility of a witness and their account without getting to know the individual? The witness factor is susceptible to various distortions that can alter the testimony, such as:
• Consumption of alcohol, drugs, or medications with side effects that impair the subject's senses.
• Severe emotional or physical stress.
• Fatigue.
• Physical or mental impairments.
• Extreme subjectivity.
• Excessive credulity.
• A desire for profit or a craving for the spotlight. • Unstable family situation.
• Lack of knowledge regarding a specific subject, leading one to firmly believe in theories that lack any observational basis.
• Exaggeration of events.
• Visual or perceptual errors.
• Strong motivation or a mindset predisposed to misinterpreting a specific event.
• Speaking based on hearsay while inserting oneself into the story of a sighting as the actual protagonist.
• Lack of adequate information regarding certain phenomena in the sky.
• Lack of awareness—on the part of the witness and society at large—regarding secret tests involving military aerial prototypes, such as those frequently conducted at the U.S. bases in Rota (Cádiz) and Morón de la Frontera (Seville) and their surrounding areas. .../...
These are some of the reasons why information received from a witness must be properly cross-checked, and why it is necessary to delve—as far as possible—into the witness's psychology to create a complete profile of the individual.
An investigation into a UFO or a specific paranormal phenomenon is not conducted in a few hours or days; a proper investigation can take weeks or months, involving the analysis of all factors and circumstances—however remote they may seem—that could affect the observer and their testimony. This entails cross-referencing star charts and meteorological, astronomical, aviation, and experimental data, and—if circumstances require—even examining the witness's medical records. Subsequently, possible similarities with other cases are analyzed; only at the very end, and after having thoroughly analyzed *everything*, can one speculate on a possible conclusion to the case. As we have seen, investigating the witness is a crucial component of any UFO or paranormal inquiry. Of course, the provision of documentation and photographic material greatly aids any researcher's work, but in this realm of evidentiary claims, we must not forget that fraud is present in a very high percentage of cases.
A proper investigation is one that perfectly balances—in the right proportions—fieldwork with documentary research. Any investigation that appears skewed toward one side or the other could—and indeed would—be labeled incomplete, biased, and incorrect.
In the early hours (2:20 a.m.) of Saturday, January 22, 2000, two military officers traveling toward Seville along the road connecting the Sevillian towns of Las Navas de la Concepción and La Puebla de los Infantes—heading toward Seville (93 km away) and just a few kilometers from the junction with Peñaflor on the C-431 highway—spotted an oval-shaped light, approximately 120 meters in size, off to their left (in the direction of travel) near the El Retortillo Reservoir.
"The light was suspended in the void; it was simply floating in the air—static, motionless... I asked Miguel what that strange light might be, but he couldn't say; the presence of construction equipment or aircraft was out of the question—we would have been notified about such things... It was very odd. As we drove toward La Puebla (de los Infantes), the light remained static; there was no sign of movement... Miguel said he would pull over at the first opportunity, and a bit further on, he stopped the car on a shoulder where we wouldn't block traffic (though at that hour, there is almost no traffic anyway, and the road itself is quite dangerous and unpleasant to drive on). We got out, took Miguel's binoculars from the trunk, and began observing the mysterious light. I have to say, it was one of the strangest things I’ve ever seen; the craft lacked any visible propulsion nozzles or thrusters, there was no exhaust plume, and the surroundings were completely silent. The lights seemed arranged in a network across the fuselage of the ship—which was shaped like a sort of flattened egg—and they all appeared to blink in unison, shifting in hue. I can tell you with absolute certainty that it wasn't one of our aircraft, a weather balloon, or anything of that sort. José Manuel, I’m not saying it was an alien spaceship—God forbid—with little green men inside; that would be ridiculous. I’m just saying it wasn't anything identifiable as the equipment we usually work with, and you know we understand what’s in our skies better than anyone... Man, you can label it a UFO if you want—but a UFO in the sense you’ve drilled into us all along—meaning an *Unidentified Flying Object* taken literally: *anything* we see that we can't identify. Gone are the days of explanations..." ...extraterrestrials, non-extraterrestrials, and the like—claims that currently lack a solid basis or foundation—neither Paco nor I would be the ones to tell you that the object was an intelligent craft crewed by stellar civilizations. If our opinion counts for anything, we can only say that in over 25 years of service in the Air Force, we had never seen or directly witnessed anything like it; we had heard many stories, but we had never experienced anything of the sort ourselves."
That concludes the account of one of our two witnesses; his testimony is corroborated by his colleague. What is there to say in the face of this? The witnesses' reliability and truthfulness are absolute. Their willingness to cooperate with this researcher of UFO and paranormal phenomena was—and remains—total. Several interviews were conducted, and they were remarkably consistent throughout... Their testimony was—quite simply—flawless, and to me, it is entirely truthful. Why would a military man—operating at their level of responsibility—invent, alter, distort, or exaggerate a story like this? Our witnesses possess a level of physical and mental stability that is simply enviable. There were no factors present that might have impaired their perception, such as the consumption of alcohol or medication. Despite the late hour, both were sufficiently well-rested to rule out fatigue as a possible explanation for the sighting. Free from emotional tension or pressure, intimately familiar with the skies, seeking neither money nor publicity, and with no likelihood of perceptual error... they were simply two professionals with extensive knowledge of the skies who had the opportunity to calmly and closely observe a mysterious oval shape—approximately 120 meters in size—encased in a "skin" of small, reddish-orange points of light. It bore no external propulsion markings or features and appeared suspended in mid-air, hovering about 150 meters above the waters of the El Retortillo Reservoir, deep within the Sierra Norte of Seville—well over 90 kilometers from the provincial capital. The National Meteorological Institute provided us with the weather report for the day and the area: a cold (6ºC to 2ºC) and clear night, with no precipitation, moderate wind gusts, and generally stable conditions—though precipitation was possible at higher altitudes. Visibility was good. No significant or unusual meteorological phenomena were reported.
The National Institute for Aerospace Technology conducted no experiments in the area, and well-informed sources confirmed this same information through a separate channel.
Seville Air Traffic Control confirmed the absence of air traffic in the area, particularly at that altitude and time. Seville Airport closes at midnight, and very few flights are recorded after that hour.
Nearby heliports also confirmed the absence of aircraft in the area.
According to NASA data, there was no visible re-entry of space debris at our latitudes...
The Army did not conduct any night-time or "blind" flight exercises in the area.
The Seville Astronomical Observatory reported nothing of particular significance in the night sky that matched the characteristics described by our witnesses.
What, then, did our two witnesses see on the night of Saturday, January 22, 2000—around 2:20 a.m.—near the El Retortillo Reservoir? Based on their own definition: a UFO.
In recent years, the Sierra Norte region of Seville has gained attention for the high frequency of mysterious lights and luminous objects appearing in its skies and around the vast expanse of water at El Retortillo, situated between the towns of Las Navas de la Concepción, Peñaflor, and San Calixto. Numerous sightings have been reported from the roads near El Cerro del Hierro, Constantina, and Lora del Río, as well as from the aforementioned towns. Recently, another sighting occurred in the same area with the following characteristics:
On February 12, 2000, a peculiar rhomboid-shaped craft was observed in the Sierra Norte of Seville; four intense orange lights were visible at what would be its four vertices. It was flying silently at a very low altitude—estimated at around 300 meters. The craft or object was approximately 30 meters long and was observed between 11:40 p.m. and 11:55 p.m. ...at the location known as Cerro del Hierro, which connects the Sevillian town of Constantina with Las Navas de la Concepción (also in Seville). Our witness was driving along the poor-quality road connecting these two towns; after traveling about 6 kilometers, he was startled by an airborne shape whose powerful headlights left Pepe Álvarez—the witness, who was driving his Renault 4L (the famous "Cuatro Latas")—dumbfounded. Preliminary, rapid inquiries revealed that no flights had taken place in the area—let alone at such a low altitude—given the extremely rugged terrain, which would make attempting flight at that height reckless. The weather was clear and quite cold (between 3°C and 5°C), with excellent visibility. The craft or object was heading northeast toward the Retortillo Reservoir—a site famous in ufological circles. Other witnesses in the town reported seeing lights at that time of night; these reports likely refer to the same sighting. As a personal note, I (the investigator) happened to be in the town of Constantina at the time due to family matters, but I only saw a distant light, as I was alerted to the event while the phenomenon was already passing by. There were no significant celestial phenomena or other events that could have caused confusion.
Numerous sightings had also been recorded previously, such as the following (presented in a brief chronology):
1. August 1998. San Nicolás del Puerto, in the famous Sierra Norte region. Time: around 2:15 AM. Four witnesses: friends and final-year university students studying Physics (two of them), Law, and Engineering. Object observed: a luminous sphere tracing strange angles across the Sevillian night sky.
2. June 12, 1999. Joaquín Díaz was driving along the local road connecting the Sevillian towns of Las Navas de la Concepción and La Puebla de los Infantes; it was already night—around 10:40 PM. – and he was on his way home after visiting relatives in the first of those towns. The road is very winding and difficult, and with night having fallen, Don Joaquín decided to slow down and drive at a moderate speed. After driving for about fifteen minutes, our witness was startled by something that left him dumbfounded: “I had been driving for quite a while as I headed down toward La Puebla. I could see the Retortillo reservoir, which I was passing on my left as I drove around it along the road... At one point, I saw a large object emerge from the water. It was huge—I don’t know, it must have been about 30 meters across. It shot out suddenly, with great force. It was very bright—a brilliant white, like the reflective uniforms firefighters wear; it was a very luminous color. It rose up, forming an immense circle (or sphere), and then folded over until it looked flattened; it was like a large five-peseta coin...” When asked if the object had any depth or volume, he told us, “No, no, it was a flat, round thing; it was like a coin. It came out and folded over until it was hovering above the water...” Joaquín illustrated his words by mimicking the object's movement with a beer bottle cap. We can describe the event this way: the object emerged from the water, rising up and forming a perfect 180-degree arc; once it had surfaced, it stabilized its position by tilting onto one side (presumably) and hovering over the lake's surface, eventually appearing from the road as nothing more than a thin line of light. The spherical part of the object’s body would have been “facing” both the lake’s surface and the sky... That is how the object remained for a mere few seconds (perhaps 5 or 10, no more), and after a slight flicker accompanied by a color change (from white to orange), it rose slightly before accelerating and vanishing into the sky in a beam of light. Joaquín was left stunned by what he had seen and began to feel great fear. What had seemed like a simple return trip to La Puebla turned into a frantic race to get home...
Luminous spheres, rhomboid, oval, and even "dimensionless" craft... all observed near the reservoir or in its vicinity—close to, or hovering over, the water...
The UFO phenomenon enters the 21st century shrouded in mystery and enigma. Through the views of both detractors and proponents, it has established itself as *the* phenomenon of our century.
Public perception of the UFO phenomenon remains incomplete and ill-informed; many still believe that a ufologist chases after "little green men"—if I may use the term—and their ships, hoping to snap a photo or conduct an interview... The reality of the UFO phenomenon is far more complex and challenging than this "out-of-focus" notion suggests. The phenomenon encompasses too many facets to be easily generalized; the social, psychological, contextual, and physical dimensions—along with the various working hypotheses and theories—make this a vast and fascinating subject. It is a field where one cannot afford to take a casual approach or neglect the study of even the most seemingly insignificant details...
Report on the "New Sightings at El Retortillo Reservoir" case by independent researcher José Manuel García Bautista (Seville).
José Manuel García Bautista
Seville, February 26, 2000.
• A personal note:
One cannot make a living from ufological and paranormal research; quite the opposite—it costs the researcher money. Yet, without a doubt, it is money well spent. There are still many who insist on dividing our field of Ufology into two camps—the pro-HET (Extraterrestrial Hypothesis) proponents and the skeptics—yet an increasing number of researchers are opting for a third path. This independent approach requires neither reconciling extremes nor aligning with either side; while perhaps the most challenging route, it is ultimately the most rewarding. You investigate what you believe in, establishing your own working methods, documentation standards, and theories. You analyze the phenomenon as comprehensively as possible, utilizing every available resource—the Internet, literature, case files, archives, and insights from fellow researchers and professionals in fields such as aeronautics, meteorology, physics, engineering, astronomy, and psychology (relying on an extensive network of contacts who often evolve from mere acquaintances into close friends)—alongside a wide array of witness testimonies. The final result is the case report: the fruit of your labor—hours, days, weeks, or even months of investigation—shared with other researchers, the media, various channels, and friends. After all, not everything in life is about money or material gain; research is also driven by passion and a genuine love for the act of investigating itself. That report contains our conclusion—often the closest approximation to the truth—because this alternative third path requires no allegiance to any specific school of thought; the investigation aligns solely with the truth, regardless of whose feelings might be hurt. There is no need to defend a specific stance: if a hoax is uncovered, it is reported as such (we have experience both in identifying and exposing them); if a case remains inconclusive, it is labeled as such; and if the object turns out to be a weather balloon or the planet Venus, that is exactly what is reported. I believe this investigative approach brings us closer to the truth than many realize. Ultimately, this long journey through Ufology or paranormal research is driven by a single, fundamental belief: the value of the investigation itself.


.jpg)






